18/09/2023
We had an Alsace Grand Cru tasting vs. Mosel, Germany GG tasting. The result is interesting. Maybe the vinyard sites I chose for the Mosel are too good lol, many participants preferred Mosel GG as the wines had more aromatic, flavor intensity; complexity; structure; and more "solid" acidity. It's like the SSR card that aroma, acidity, complexity, intensity, and finish all got 4-5 marks (5 is max in general). While Alsace, depending on soil type, can have 5+ in one or 2 parts but 2-3 only in other parts. As Alsace has 50+ grand cru and nearly 10 Clos, this round we tried the top 4 Grand Cru (Schlossberg, Hengst, Schoenenbourg & Rangen) & 2 Clos (Landelin & Urbain). For vintage, we covered both great vintage 2018 & 19 and poor vintage 2006. Although I need to spend a lot of time lining up the bottles, it's worth it. For me, Rangen's smoke aroma, Hengst's intensity & minerality all can be found out. Tasting textbook styles in different soil types is really amazing as not every time we can have such a good tasting experience.
While for Mosel, we tried Mosel GG Riesling and had some best vineyards like Juffer, Domprobst, Sonnenuhr from Prüm families, and Fritz Haag. As all are one soil type only, the Devonian slate, we can't find any differences in aromas for these 3 vineyards. Although these 3 btls are from different vintages, from poor 2012, average 2016 & excellent 2018, all in aroma can't have a huge difference. And palate, of coz 2018 is the best but just a bit deeper in finish & complexity, all 3 btls were definitely outstanding btls.
In conclusion, if you are looking for diversity, try Alsace pls. But you really need sufficient knowledge for wine selection. There are too many Grand Cru & too many wineries there. If you worry there are too many choices, please buy Schlossberg Grand Cru. The best Grand Cru maybe, and the 1st Grand Cru of Alsace. It is the only Riesling Grand Cru we had can against Mosel's best vineyards, and is the 1st btl we finished in the very beginning during the tasting.